---
title: "Recital 75"
url: "https://prighter.com/resources/laws/e-evidence-regulation/recitals/recital-75"
type: "recital"
date: "2026-10-19T16:42:23.111Z"
---

# Recital 75

Where an addressee considers that a European Production Order in a specific case would entail the violation of a legal obligation deriving from the law of a third country, it should inform the issuing authority and the enforcing authority of its reasons for not executing the order by way of a reasoned objection, using the form provided for in this Regulation. The issuing authority should review the European Production Order on the basis of the reasoned objection and any input provided by the enforcing State, taking into account the same criteria that the competent court of the issuing State would have to follow. Where the issuing authority intends to uphold the order, it should request a review by the competent court of the issuing State, as notified by the relevant Member State, which should review the order.

## Sitemap

- Site map (Markdown): https://prighter.com/sitemap.md
- LLMs index: https://prighter.com/llms.txt