🔍 Face search company Clearview AI overturns UK privacy fine

Clearview AI, a company specializing in facial recognition technology, has successfully overturned a £7.5 million privacy fine imposed by the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (#ICO). The company’s innovative technology empowers clients to search a vast database of images collected from the internet for matches to specific faces, providing valuable links to where these matching images appear online.

Clearview AI primarily serves law enforcement agencies outside the UK, and this appeal hinged on the fact that the ICO lacked jurisdiction in this specific case. The three-member tribunal at the First-tier Tribunal concluded that the ICO did not have the authority to take enforcement action or issue a fine because Clearview AI was used solely by law enforcement bodies operating beyond the UK.

Critics have raised concerns about the privacy and civil liberties implications of this technology, often dubbing it as a “perpetual police line-up.” This decision, while in favor of Clearview AI, underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the ethical and legal boundaries of facial recognition technology.

The ICO has stated that this judgment doesn’t negate its ability to act against international companies processing data of people in the UK, particularly those scraping data of individuals in the UK. This case serves as a reminder that the issue of scraping large volumes of publicly available data remains a topic of significant importance in the realm of data protection and privacy.

Check out the latest posts:


📜 White House issues Executive Order setting new standards for AI regulation 🌐

President Biden has taken a stride in ensuring that America takes the forefront in harnessing the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) while also addressing its challenges.


Update on EU's AI Act: EU policymakers Have Proposed Stricter Regulations for High-Risk AI Systems

EU policymakers are planning to have changes to the AI Act, aimed at regulating Artificial Intelligence in a risk-based approach. The core of this legislation is to ensure the safety and protection of fundamental rights when it comes to high-risk AI systems.

In the original proposal, certain AI solutions were automatically categorized as high-risk, but recent discussions introduced exemption conditions to allow AI developers to avoid this classification. However, the European Parliament’s legal office expressed concerns that this approach might lead to legal uncertainty and not align with the AI Act’s objectives.


🌐 Shaping AI Liability Rules: EDPS's Vision for Equitable Protection in Europe

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) has issued own-initiative Opinion on two critical proposals regarding AI liability. These proposals are integral to the European Commission’s broader plan to support the responsible deployment of artificial intelligence in Europe.